2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD vs 2024 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Standard Range RWD
Side-by-side fuel economy ratings, standardized trip fuel requirements, and operating expense comparisons based on official EPA test certifications.
Hyundai Ioniq 5 is more fuel efficient: 110 MPGe combined versus 102 MPGe for the Ford Mustang Mach-E (+8% efficiency advantage).
Certified EPA Spec Comparison
15,000 mi / year baseline| Specification | Ford Mustang Mach-E | Hyundai Ioniq 5 |
|---|---|---|
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy | 102 MPGe | 110 MPGe |
| City / Highway Ratings | 106 / 98 MPGe | 127 / 94 MPGe |
| Fuel / Energy Consumed per 100 Miles | 33.0 kWh / 100 mi | 30.6 kWh / 100 mi |
| Estimated Cost Per Mile (EPA Baseline) | $0.05 / mi | $0.05 / mi |
| Annual Fuel Cost Estimate (15k mi) | $750 | $700 |
| Monthly Fuel Budget (15k mi/yr) | $63 / mo | $58 / mo |
| Tailpipe CO2 Emissions | 0 g / mi | 0 g / mi |
| Annual Carbon Output (15k mi) | 0.00 metric tons | 0.00 metric tons |
| Powertrain Fuel Type | EV | EV |
| EPA Source Test ID | #47822 | #46961 |
Standard Distance Fuel Requirements & Trip Costs
Estimated fuel or energy required and trip costs across standardized distances at official EPA baseline rates.
| Distance | Ford Mustang Mach-E | Hyundai Ioniq 5 | Trip Cost Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 miles (Regional trip) | 33 kWh ($5.00) | 30.6 kWh ($4.67) | $0.33 savings (Hyundai Ioniq 5) |
| 250 miles (Weekend getaway) | 82.6 kWh ($12.50) | 76.6 kWh ($11.67) | $0.83 savings (Hyundai Ioniq 5) |
| 500 miles (Full-day interstate) | 165.2 kWh ($25.00) | 153.2 kWh ($23.33) | $1.67 savings (Hyundai Ioniq 5) |
| 1,000 miles (Multi-state road trip) | 330.4 kWh ($50.00) | 306.4 kWh ($46.67) | $3.33 savings (Hyundai Ioniq 5) |
Powertrain & Fuel Efficiency Analysis
Both the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Hyundai Ioniq 5 are fully electric vehicles. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 (110 MPGe) is 8% more energy efficient than the Ford Mustang Mach-E (102 MPGe), consuming fewer kilowatt-hours per 100 miles. Because both vehicles charge using electric power, this efficiency edge directly translates to lower electricity costs and faster range recovery during charging.
Compounding Cost Over Time
Projected cumulative fuel expenditure difference across 1, 3, 5, and 10 years of ownership (15,000 miles/yr).
Fuel cost differences compound significantly over standard ownership cycles. At 15,000 miles driven annually, choosing the Hyundai Ioniq 5 over the Ford Mustang Mach-E saves approximately $150 after 3 years, $250 after 5 years, and $500 over a 10-year lifespan. This multi-thousand dollar operating difference can meaningfully offset upfront vehicle purchase price differentials.
Refueling Logistics & Operating Profiles
Both the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Hyundai Ioniq 5 recharge via standard J1772 and NACS fast-charging networks. Because the Hyundai Ioniq 5 consumes fewer kilowatt-hours per 100 miles than the Ford Mustang Mach-E, it extracts more driving distance from each charging session and minimizes time spent at commercial DC fast charging plazas during interstate road trips.
Carbon Footprint & Environmental Impact
Both the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Hyundai Ioniq 5 produce virtually identical tailpipe emissions at approximately 0.00 metric tons of CO2 annually per 15,000 miles driven (0 g/mi).
Full Vehicle Specifications & Planning Tools
Explore complete certified EPA details, custom fuel calculators, and road trip tools for each model:
Frequently asked questions
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is more fuel efficient, rated at 110 MPGe combined versus 102 MPGe for the Ford Mustang Mach-E—a 8% efficiency advantage in certified EPA testing.
Based on EPA methodology assuming 15,000 miles driven annually, choosing the Hyundai Ioniq 5 saves approximately $150 over 3 years and $250 over 5 years compared to the Ford Mustang Mach-E.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E consumes approximately 33.0 kWh per 100 miles, while the Hyundai Ioniq 5 consumes approximately 30.6 kWh per 100 miles.
Both vehicles produce identical tailpipe emissions of 0 grams of CO2 per mile.
Yes. A vehicle with higher MPGe consumes fewer kilowatt-hours per mile, which means it requires less charging time to recover a given amount of driving range when plugged into a Level 2 or DC fast charger.
Not necessarily. Fuel expense is only one component of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). Vehicle purchase price, financing interest, insurance premiums, maintenance schedules, and residual resale depreciation all influence long-term ownership costs.