2024 Ford Maverick Hybrid XLT vs 2024 Toyota Tacoma SR5

Side-by-side fuel economy ratings, standardized trip fuel requirements, and operating expense comparisons based on official EPA test certifications.

Ford Maverick Hybrid is more fuel efficient: 37 MPG combined versus 22 MPG for the Toyota Tacoma (+68% efficiency advantage).

Certified EPA Spec Comparison

15,000 mi / year baseline
SpecificationFord Maverick HybridToyota Tacoma
EPA Combined Fuel Economy37 MPG22 MPG
City / Highway Ratings42 / 33 MPG20 / 24 MPG
Fuel / Energy Consumed per 100 Miles2.70 gal / 100 mi4.55 gal / 100 mi
Estimated Cost Per Mile (EPA Baseline)$0.11 / mi$0.18 / mi
Annual Fuel Cost Estimate (15k mi)$1,600$2,750
Monthly Fuel Budget (15k mi/yr)$133 / mo$229 / mo
Tailpipe CO2 Emissions237 g / mi405 g / mi
Annual Carbon Output (15k mi)3.56 metric tons6.08 metric tons
Powertrain Fuel TypeHYBRIDGASOLINE
EPA Source Test ID#47364#47588

Standard Distance Fuel Requirements & Trip Costs

Estimated fuel or energy required and trip costs across standardized distances at official EPA baseline rates.

DistanceFord Maverick HybridToyota TacomaTrip Cost Difference
100 miles (Regional trip)2.7 gal ($10.67)4.5 gal ($18.33)$7.67 savings (Ford Maverick Hybrid)
250 miles (Weekend getaway)6.8 gal ($26.67)11.4 gal ($45.83)$19.17 savings (Ford Maverick Hybrid)
500 miles (Full-day interstate)13.5 gal ($53.33)22.7 gal ($91.67)$38.33 savings (Ford Maverick Hybrid)
1,000 miles (Multi-state road trip)27 gal ($106.67)45.5 gal ($183.33)$76.67 savings (Ford Maverick Hybrid)

Powertrain & Fuel Efficiency Analysis

Cross-shopping a hybrid against a conventional gasoline vehicle highlights substantial operating cost differences. The hybrid Ford Maverick Hybrid (37 MPG) delivers 68% better fuel economy than the gasoline Toyota Tacoma (22 MPG), saving approximately $1,150 each year across 15,000 miles of mixed driving.

Compounding Cost Over Time

Projected cumulative fuel expenditure difference across 1, 3, 5, and 10 years of ownership (15,000 miles/yr).

1-Year Difference$1,150
3-Year Difference$3,450
5-Year Difference$5,750
10-Year Difference$11,500

Fuel cost differences compound significantly over standard ownership cycles. At 15,000 miles driven annually, choosing the Ford Maverick Hybrid over the Toyota Tacoma saves approximately $3,450 after 3 years, $5,750 after 5 years, and $11,500 over a 10-year lifespan. This multi-thousand dollar operating difference can meaningfully offset upfront vehicle purchase price differentials.

Refueling Logistics & Operating Profiles

Both vehicles use identical retail gas station infrastructure and take just minutes to fill. However, the hybrid Ford Maverick Hybrid recaptures deceleration energy via regenerative braking and frequently shuts off its combustion engine in city traffic, giving it a commanding advantage in stop-and-go driving. On sustained high-speed highway cruising, the efficiency gap narrows as the combustion engine provides continuous propulsion.

Carbon Footprint & Environmental Impact

The Ford Maverick Hybrid produces 237 grams of tailpipe CO2 per mile (3.56 metric tons/year at 15,000 miles) versus 405 g/mi (6.08 metric tons/year) for the Toyota Tacoma. Over 5 years of driving, the Ford Maverick Hybrid prevents approximately 12.6 metric tons of direct greenhouse gas emissions from entering the atmosphere.

Frequently asked questions

The Ford Maverick Hybrid is more fuel efficient, rated at 37 MPG combined versus 22 MPG for the Toyota Tacoma—a 68% efficiency advantage in certified EPA testing.

Based on EPA methodology assuming 15,000 miles driven annually, choosing the Ford Maverick Hybrid saves approximately $3,450 over 3 years and $5,750 over 5 years compared to the Toyota Tacoma.

The Ford Maverick Hybrid consumes approximately 2.70 gallons per 100 miles, while the Toyota Tacoma consumes approximately 4.55 gallons per 100 miles.

The Ford Maverick Hybrid produces fewer tailpipe emissions at 237 grams of CO2 per mile (3.56 metric tons/year) versus 405 g/mi for the Toyota Tacoma.

The hybrid advantage peaks in city driving with frequent braking, where regenerative braking reclaims energy. On flat, high-speed interstate highway cruising, the hybrid's combustion engine runs continuously, narrowing the fuel economy advantage over the conventional gasoline vehicle.

Not necessarily. Fuel expense is only one component of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). Vehicle purchase price, financing interest, insurance premiums, maintenance schedules, and residual resale depreciation all influence long-term ownership costs.