2024 Hyundai Elantra SEL vs 2024 Kia Forte LXS

Side-by-side fuel economy ratings, standardized trip fuel requirements, and operating expense comparisons based on official EPA test certifications.

Hyundai Elantra is more fuel efficient: 34 MPG combined versus 32 MPG for the Kia Forte (+6% efficiency advantage).

Certified EPA Spec Comparison

15,000 mi / year baseline
SpecificationHyundai ElantraKia Forte
EPA Combined Fuel Economy34 MPG32 MPG
City / Highway Ratings31 / 40 MPG28 / 39 MPG
Fuel / Energy Consumed per 100 Miles2.94 gal / 100 mi3.13 gal / 100 mi
Estimated Cost Per Mile (EPA Baseline)$0.12 / mi$0.13 / mi
Annual Fuel Cost Estimate (15k mi)$1,750$1,900
Monthly Fuel Budget (15k mi/yr)$146 / mo$158 / mo
Tailpipe CO2 Emissions257 g / mi277 g / mi
Annual Carbon Output (15k mi)3.86 metric tons4.16 metric tons
Powertrain Fuel TypeGASOLINEGASOLINE
EPA Source Test ID#47074#47080

Standard Distance Fuel Requirements & Trip Costs

Estimated fuel or energy required and trip costs across standardized distances at official EPA baseline rates.

DistanceHyundai ElantraKia ForteTrip Cost Difference
100 miles (Regional trip)2.9 gal ($11.67)3.1 gal ($12.67)$1.00 savings (Hyundai Elantra)
250 miles (Weekend getaway)7.4 gal ($29.17)7.8 gal ($31.67)$2.50 savings (Hyundai Elantra)
500 miles (Full-day interstate)14.7 gal ($58.33)15.6 gal ($63.33)$5.00 savings (Hyundai Elantra)
1,000 miles (Multi-state road trip)29.4 gal ($116.67)31.3 gal ($126.67)$10.00 savings (Hyundai Elantra)

Powertrain & Fuel Efficiency Analysis

In this gasoline matchup, the Hyundai Elantra achieves 34 MPG combined compared to 32 MPG for the Kia Forte, delivering a 6% fuel efficiency advantage. Over 15,000 miles of driving per year, the Hyundai Elantra saves approximately $150 in fuel expenses at official EPA benchmark rates.

Compounding Cost Over Time

Projected cumulative fuel expenditure difference across 1, 3, 5, and 10 years of ownership (15,000 miles/yr).

1-Year Difference$150
3-Year Difference$450
5-Year Difference$750
10-Year Difference$1,500

Fuel cost differences compound significantly over standard ownership cycles. At 15,000 miles driven annually, choosing the Hyundai Elantra over the Kia Forte saves approximately $450 after 3 years, $750 after 5 years, and $1,500 over a 10-year lifespan. This multi-thousand dollar operating difference can meaningfully offset upfront vehicle purchase price differentials.

Refueling Logistics & Operating Profiles

Both the Hyundai Elantra and Kia Forte refuel using standard commercial gas stations in 3 to 5 minutes. The Hyundai Elantra requires less fuel per 100 miles driven than the Kia Forte, lowering operating costs on both daily commutes and long interstate trips. Actual driving range between fill-ups depends on factory fuel tank options (such as standard vs. extended-range tanks) multiplied by certified combined fuel economy.

Carbon Footprint & Environmental Impact

The Hyundai Elantra produces 257 grams of tailpipe CO2 per mile (3.86 metric tons/year at 15,000 miles) versus 277 g/mi (4.16 metric tons/year) for the Kia Forte. Over 5 years of driving, the Hyundai Elantra prevents approximately 1.5 metric tons of direct greenhouse gas emissions from entering the atmosphere.

Frequently asked questions

The Hyundai Elantra is more fuel efficient, rated at 34 MPG combined versus 32 MPG for the Kia Forte—a 6% efficiency advantage in certified EPA testing.

Based on EPA methodology assuming 15,000 miles driven annually, choosing the Hyundai Elantra saves approximately $450 over 3 years and $750 over 5 years compared to the Kia Forte.

The Hyundai Elantra consumes approximately 2.94 gallons per 100 miles, while the Kia Forte consumes approximately 3.13 gallons per 100 miles.

The Hyundai Elantra produces fewer tailpipe emissions at 257 grams of CO2 per mile (3.86 metric tons/year) versus 277 g/mi for the Kia Forte.

The Hyundai Elantra achieves 31 city / 40 highway MPG, while the Kia Forte achieves 28 city / 39 highway MPG. If you drive primarily on interstates or primarily in urban traffic, compare the specific city or highway ratings rather than only the combined score.

Not necessarily. Fuel expense is only one component of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). Vehicle purchase price, financing interest, insurance premiums, maintenance schedules, and residual resale depreciation all influence long-term ownership costs.